Skip to content

Efforts by anti-Ashram elements to scuttle inquiry fails!

September 26, 2013

As the D-day for the inquiry into the irregularities alleged by Raman Reddy, Sraddhalu Ranade, R.Y. Deshpande and other anti-Ashram elements has been approaching, it turns out that behind the scenes, these trouble-makers have in reality been busy trying to scuttle the inquiry that is to be conducted by a retired judge, as it evidently doesn’t suit them anymore.

These anti-Ashram elements had wanted the Puducherry Government Collector to conduct the inquiry, because the Collector, being a public servant of the local Government, could be ‘influenced’ by some of the power-wielding, local politicians who are known to bully and intimidate bureaucrats to get them to do what they want. The Madras High Court’s order striking down the Collector’s inquiry had served a big blow to the anti-Ashram elements who had pinned their hopes on political influence rather than on judicial process.

[It is important to remind our readers that the manner in which the Puducherry Collector initiated his ‘inquiry’ unilaterally and with a ‘predetermined mind’, basing himself on unsubstantiated allegations, without following a due process, just because he was approached by a local MLA, Ashok Anand who was accompanied by anti-Ashram elements, was to begin with highly suspect. The Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust had done well to challenge the Collector’s arbitrary inquiry which the courts eventually halted.]

Despite Sridharan’s bravado and posturing on the CHOLA-TLOSA website, while proclaiming that “a retired Judge will be more effective than the Collector to take the Ashram Trust to task if he finds anything hanky panky with it,” the truth has now emerged that the retired judge’s inquiry didn’t really suit these anti-Ashram elements.

Following the Madras High Court’s order and appointment of PR Raman, former judge of the Kerala HC, as inquiry officer, these anti-Ashram elements, who in court pretended to agree with this order, have instead been trying hard to scuttle such an inquiry by filing an appeal against the Madras High Court’s order appointing the retired judge as the inquiry officer. If Sridharan and his other anti-Ashram elements were so content with with the appointment of the inquiry officer, why are his colleagues instead trying to put spokes in the wheel of the judicial inquiry that is about to begin?

As all the initiatives to promote falsehood that are instigated by these anti-Ashram elements are doomed to fail, their latest efforts to scuttle the inquiry have also failed.

This is reported below:

Logo

HC dismisses appeal against appointment of inquiry officer

Press Trust of India  |  Chennai  September 25, 2013

Madras High Court today dismissed an appeal against a single judge’s order appointing a retired judge of Kerala High Court as the inquiry officer to probe allegations against Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust in Puducherry.

Dismissing the appeal filed by Dayanidi Patel and two others, the First Bench, comprising Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Kumar Agrawal and Justice M Sathyanarayanan, said the “interim order passed by Justice KK Sasidharan would disclose that the interest of all parties has been taken into consideration by the single judge, who has passed a detailed order by issuing certain directions.”

Originally, the Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust in Puducherry had filed a petition challenging the order for initiating an inquiry into the allegations made by some of its inmates including Ashok Anand and Vishnu Lalit.

It had also challenged the notice dated October 1, 2012, inviting the interested inmates and others to approach the Deputy Collector (Revenue) in connection with the inquiry.

Taking note of the fact that the Ashram was not against the inquiry, but only against the Collector conducting the probe “with a predetermined mind”, Justice Sasidharan, with the consent of both sides, appointed Justice PR Raman, a retired Judge of Kerala High Court, as the Inquiry Officer.

The bench dismissed the appeal against the appointment of Justice Raman, stating that there was no merit in it.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Order appointing Justice P.R. Raman upheld

CHENNAI, September 25, 2013

Special Correspondent

 The Madras High Court has upheld a single judge’s interim order appointing Justice P.R. Raman, a former judge of the Kerala High Court, to enquire into allegations of sexual harassment of women and children in the Sri Aurobindo Ashram in Puducherry.

In its judgment on an appeal, the First Bench, comprising Acting Chief Justice R.K. Agrawal and Justice M. Sathyanarayanan, said a perusal of the interim order of August 13 would show that the interest of all the parties had been taken into consideration by the single judge (Justice K.K.Sasidharan), who passed a detailed order by issuing certain directions.

Originally, the writ petition was filed by Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust challenging an order initiating enquiry into the charges made by some of the ashramites and the consequential notice of October 1 last year inviting interested members of the ashram and others to approach the Deputy Collector (Revenue) in connection with the enquiry.

The judge took note of the fact that the ashram was not against holding an enquiry regarding the complaints by inmates and the local legislator, and the primary objection was only against the Collector holding the enquiry into the matter with a predetermined mind. The judge suggested two names, out of which the parties had agreed for appointing Justice P.R.Raman, a former judge of the Kerala High Court.

The Bench said the primary objection raised by three persons, the appellants, seemed to be that an Administrator should be appointed by dissolving the trust board to ensure that there would be a free and fair enquiry. The single judge had taken note of the submission and found that a scheme notice was pending before the District Court, Puducherry, and therefore rightly rejected the submission.

The judge had also passed certain directions. The prayer sought for by the appellants for taking over the administration by an Administrator, for the present, did not arise for consideration. There was no merit in the writ appeal, the Bench said and dismissed the appeal. 

=========================================================================================================

– The Well-wishers of Sri Aurobindo Ashram – 

Advertisements
3 Comments
  1. daksha permalink

    apart from dayanidhi patel, who are the two others. kindly give names.
    what was the contention of these three against the inquiry, please clarify their points.
    this will make clear why they do not want it. the press report does not clarify it.
    so the opposition is just to oppose everything. whatever be its merits.
    this way the court cases will become a permanent feature.
    saice should start a law course in llb at the minimum. these students can become legal counsels and save lawyer fees for saat.

    daksha

  2. FACTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROVERSY INITIATED BY SOME DEVOTEES III

    In the course of a talk delivered at Ahmedabad on 27th September 2012, Shraddhalu Ranade alleged to the effect that the Mother had given Polydaon’s role to Manoj Dasgupta because She had recognized in him a dark and evil force. It is already shown on this website by producing irrefutable evidence that his assertion was factually incorrect. However, in addition I feel it necessary to show, through logical analysis of the allegation, that the finger he has raised against Manoj Dasgupta has actually turned to him only and had revealed his true color. In an attempt to malign Manoj Dasgupta he has virtually maligned his own image. His arrow has boomeranged.
    On this website it is already shown that there is no evidence of the Mother having ever said that She had recognized in Manoj Dasgupta a dark and evil force. Then is it Sraddhalu’s creative genius that has concocted this story and thereby has presented a false image of the Mother before the public of Ahmedabad under the guise of presenting before them his vision of Affirmative Spirituality? About Peter Hees’ book on the Lives of Sri Aurobindo he has alleged of his desecrating the image of Sri Aurobindo. At present we may leave aside the question whether Peter has actually done so, or had an intention to do so, and it appears that he has not, but here while claiming to read the mind of the Mother Shraddhalu had just imagined of Her having recognized in Manoj Dasgupta a dark and evil force and had thereby actually attempted to present a false picture of the Mother before general public and thus has really desecrated Her image.
    It is found that generally in the dramatic performances even in the institutions other than our Ashram the persons who play the role of a villain are not chosen in virtue of their actually being villains and mostly they are not villains in real life. Then how come the Mother chose a performance having a provision of a villain therein and chose a real villain to play that role? Those who have a slightest acquaintance with the mode of Her working would not even imagine that She would prefer such treatment to erring disciples to give them an opportunity to rise above their shortcomings by initially thus branding them as dark and evil force under the cover of selecting them to play a role of villain in a drama to be staged in the Ashram, as Shraddhalu imagines. I wonder how could he who claims to be a devotee and a scholar see in our Mother such perversion. It appears that in his vindictive stance to malign Manoj Dasgupta, he has crossed all limits which resulted in virtually maligning the image of the Mother in public eye.
    This is an apt example of a crooked thinking on the part of Shraddhalu, and also of his associates who toe this line of action, to say the least. He does not care to verify the veracity of his premises, nor does he care to see whether they support the conclusion he desires to derive and rushes to attack his opponent for the purpose best known to him. Any stick is good enough for him if it strikes at his opponent and injures him. He has audacity to screen even a video of a sting operation carried out by a news channel and subsequently withdrawn. Such mode of operation is in tune with the working of falsehood in our life. It does not serve the cause of Spirituality which he claims to promote. You have to be rational in your dealings before you rise to Spiritual Heights or serve the Spiritual Cause. You have to become human before striving to become Superman. He desires to teach a lesson to the Trustees of our Ashram and especially to Manoj Dasgupta. But then it would be pertinent to say: Physician heal thyself.

    – Govardhan Dave

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. SC will not order Ashram probe without full-fledged hearing | Well-wishers of Sri Aurobindo Ashram

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: